TENANCY TIPS:
Eviction in the ACT
** last updated: 08/07/09 **
Download
a .pdf version of this tipsheet
All
tenancies in the ACT are regulated by the
Residential Tenancies Act 1997
(RTA).
The
terms of your tenancy agreement are set out in the RTA, and are known as
the Standard Tenancy Terms (STT). The landlord, or their agent, may
only terminate a tenancy agreement in accordance with Part 4 of the RTA,
and the STT.
When can a tenant be evicted?
The general effect of the
legislation is to ensure that a tenant can only be evicted in the ACT
if:
· They
have breached the terms of their tenancy agreement; or
· The
landlord has other lawful grounds for termination or reason for
needing to recover the premises.
A
landlord cannot terminate the tenancy just because the agreed fixed
term has expired. When a fixed term expires it does not end the
tenancy—it means that the tenancy no longer has a set term, this is
called a periodic tenancy.
Who can evict a tenant?
The landlord or agent can
serve a notice to vacate however,
only
the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal (ACAT) can order an eviction,
and only the police can carry out the eviction.
An important protection
given by the RTA is the prohibition in section 37 against a landlord
attempting to recover possession in any other manner than that provided
by the Act.
Protection of sub-tenants
The legislation not only
protects tenants from unlawful eviction, but also extends protection to
lawful sub-tenants.
If the
landlord has
consented in writing to a sub-tenancy,
then the sub-tenant is protected from unlawful eviction like any other
tenant.
The law does not protect
occupants or unapproved sub-tenants from eviction to the same degree. If
you think you might fall into one of these categories, you should seek
specific advice or see the Occupancy Tips leaflet:
Ending an Occupancy Agreement & Eviction.
eviction Process
A landlord seeking to terminate a tenancy must follow a strict process
set out in the RTA. There is
no
lawful shortcut available,
even where the tenant is in breach of the tenancy agreement or behind in
the rent. In general, the process is:
1. Notice
· The
landlord or agent must serve a valid, written
notice
to vacate on the
tenant, providing the tenant with the correct period of notice
applicable to the type of tenancy and grounds for termination: cl 83
(see over the page for grounds);
· The
landlord/agent must have, and must state in the notice, one or more of
the lawful grounds for termination set out in the RTA, as well as
sufficient details identifying the circumstance giving rise to the
grounds: cl 83(b);
· The
notice to vacate should also specify that the landlord requires the
tenant to vacate on expiry of the notice period, and that the tenancy
will end on the day the tenant vacates;
· Note
that if the landlord’s/agent’s reason for the termination is that the
tenant has breached the tenancy agreement, the landlord usually must
first issue a
notice to remedy
before issuing the notice to vacate – see page 3 “Termination
for breach by the tenant”.
2. Order from ACAT
· If
the tenant does not voluntarily move out of the premises after receiving
valid notice, the landlord
must apply to ACAT
for a
termination and possession order
(TPO); and
· The
tenant has the right to (and should) be present at the ACAT hearing to
defend an eviction.
3. Warrant for eviction
· If
ACAT has made a TPO, it can also issue a warrant for eviction. This
warrant gives the police the power to evict the tenant within a
specified time if the tenant has not vacated of their own accord as
directed by the TPO.
· The
police must give the tenant at least 2 days notice of the eviction,
unless there are exceptional circumstances involved.
Back to top
Grounds for termination
Listed
below are the only permissible grounds for termination of the tenancy
agreement, leading to eviction:
Termination of any tenancy
Grounds in the RTA
The RTA says that, on
application by the landlord, the Tribunal (ACAT)
MAY
terminate a tenancy
in the following situations:
· Where
there are grounds for termination under the STT (cl 86, 94, and 96), the
landlord has given the correct notice; and the tenant has not vacated (s
47);
· Where
the tenant has
breached the STT (see
page 3 for details),
the landlord has given the
correct notice and the tenant has not vacated (ss 48-49);
· Where
the landlord would suffer
significant hardship
if the tenancy continued and this hardship is greater than the hardship
the tenant would suffer if it was terminated (s 50);
· Where
the tenant has caused or permitted
serious
damage to the
property of the landlord,
or
injury to the
landlord or a member of their family (s 51);
· Where
the agreement was induced by a
false
or misleading statement
of the tenant (s 52);
· Where
the tenancy agreement was part of a contract of
employment, the
tenant has ceased working and the premises are required to house another
employee (s 53);
· Where
the tenant has
repudiated the
tenancy agreement, the landlord accepted this, and the tenant has failed
to vacate (s 55). Repudiation means to indicate that you no longer wish
to be bound by the tenancy agreement; or
· Where
the tenant has
sublet
the premises
without written permission (s 54).
Grounds
in the Tenancy Agreement
Clause 86 – Termination where premises are unfit for habitation
Under cl86
either
party may give
written notice to terminate the tenancy if the premises are unfit for
habitation, or are not available due to government action. The tenant
must give 2 days notice, and the landlord at least 1 week (cl 87).
Posting Clauses
Some tenancy agreements
also contain a special term – known as a ‘posting clause’ – that
provides an additional ground for termination on 4 weeks notice where a
party (either the landlord or the tenant) is being posted to or away
from the ACT in the course of their employment (s 8).
Termination of a periodic tenancy
As well as the above
grounds, in a periodic tenancy (after the fixed term of the tenancy has
ended, or where there is no fixed term) there is additional scope for
the landlord to terminate the tenancy. The landlord may terminate a
periodic tenancy where there are grounds set out in cl 96, or by issuing
a ‘no cause’ notice to vacate: cl 94.
Termination With Cause (Clause 96 STT))
Cl96 sets out the grounds
for termination and the period of notice the landlord must give, as
follows:
· That
the landlord
or
their immediate relative,
or
a person who has a close personal relationship, and a reasonable
expectation that the landlord would provide them with accommodation,
genuinely intends
to
live in
the premises (cl
96(1)(a),(b) and (c)) [4
weeks notice];
· That
the landlord has a
genuine intention
to
sell
the premises (cl
96(1)(d)) [8
weeks notice]; or
· That
the landlord has a
genuine intention
to
reconstruct, renovate or make major repairs
that cannot reasonably be
carried out with the tenant living in the premises (cl 96(1)(e)) [12
weeks notice].
A notice under cl 96 can only be issued when the tenancy is periodic.
This means such a notice cannot be given to a tenant who is in a fixed
term tenancy.
However, such a notice can be served once the fixed term expires and the
tenancy becomes periodic.
Termination Without Cause (Clause 94 STT)
A landlord is able to
terminate a tenancy without providing a cause. However, this may
only
occur where:
(a) 26
weeks notice is
given; and
(b) the
notice does not require the tenant to vacate during a fixed term.
A notice under cl 94 can
be issued at any time (even during a fixed term tenancy), as long as the
date for vacation is after the fixed term has expired.
Where cl94 or cl96 are
used, the
tenant
may vacate at any
time during the 2 weeks prior to the date for vacation on the landlord’s
notice, as long as the tenant gives 4 days notice to the landlord (cl
95, cl 97).
Also, under cl88 the
tenant can give their own 3 weeks written notice of intention to vacate
at any time during a periodic tenancy.
Back to top
Termination for A breach by THE tenant
When a landlord or agent wants to terminate a tenancy and have the
tenant vacate the property for a breach of the tenancy agreement they
must have valid grounds and they must follow the processes set out in
the STT.
Failure to pay rent—clause 92
If rent goes unpaid for 7
days (this includes only paying part of the rent), on the
8th
day the landlord
may serve a
Notice
to Remedy (NTR).
This must say if the outstanding rent is paid within the next 7 days, no
further action will be taken and the tenancy will continue.
If the rent is not paid
within that 7 days, a
Notice
to Vacate (NTV) may
be served, giving the tenant 14 days to move out. At this time the
landlord can also make an application for a
TPO
to ACAT. However the ACAT hearing cannot take place until the date for
vacation specified in the NTV has passed.
Where 2 previous notices
to remedy have been served (on any ground) during a tenancy, and there
is a failure to pay rent the landlord may serve a notice to vacate one
week after the day on which the rent is due without first serving the
notice to remedy.
Other breaches—clause 93
For other breaches that
are serious enough to justify terminating the tenancy the landlord must
give a notice to the tenant to remedy the breach within 14 days, if it
is capable of remedy. If the breach is not remedied within that time,
or is incapable of being remedied, a notice to vacate within 14 days can
be served. If the tenant does not vacate within the 14 days, the
landlord will need to make an application to the ACAT for a TPO in order
to remove the tenant.
If the tenant breaches the
standard terms on three occasions on any grounds, on the third occasion
a notice to vacate may be served immediately — a notice to remedy is not
required.
Defective Notices
Where a defective notice
is served on a tenant and the tenant vacates the property, the tenancy
agreement terminates on the day the tenant vacates, but the tenant may
apply to ACAT for compensation for wrongful eviction, or if possible for
reinstatement as tenant (s 58).
Where a defective notice
is served and the tenant doesn't vacate, the landlord may apply for the
defect to be waived. To do so the Tribunal must be satisfied that the
defect didn't put the tenant in a significantly worse position (s 59).
Back
to top
What if I don’t think the landlord has
grounds to terminate my tenancy?
If you have received a
Notice to Remedy and you don’t accept that the landlord or agent has a
legitimate claim, or that the breach justifies termination of the
agreement you can respond to the notice. For example if the agent sends
a NTR stating that you have breached the tenancy agreement by having a
guest stay overnight, or not having the premises spotless for an
inspection you can respond that there has been no breach and therefore
the NTR is not valid. Make sure you keep a copy of this response.
If you then receive a
Notice to Vacate you can respond in writing to say that you do not
accept these grounds and that there is no basis for terminating the
tenancy and you will not be vacating.
If you don’t vacate the
landlord or agent may accept that they do not have grounds and not take
any further action
however
they can also still
make (or have already made) an application to ACAT. If this happens you
will be able to present your argument to the Tribunal.
the Tribunal process
If the notice to vacate
has expired and the tenant has not vacated the premises, the landlord
must make an
application to the tribunal for a termination and possession order if
they want to have the tenant evicted.
When a landlord or agent
has made an application to the Tribunal the Registrar of the Tribunal
must send out a written notice of the time and place for the hearing to
the parties concerned. The tenant will receive a Notice of Hearing.
The Tribunal aims to have
a turnaround of no more than 14 days for a matter. This means that once
the tenant receives a “Notice of Hearing” they should act
immediately. At
this stage it is advisable to obtain advice from the Tenants' Advice
Service, Welfare Rights and Legal Centre or an independent solicitor, if
this has not already been done.
If you intend to challenge
an eviction see our tips sheet -
“Tenancy Tips: Defending an Eviction”.
For details about Tribunal
processes see our Tips sheet—
“ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal (ACAT)”.
Retaliatory Applications
If you believe that the
landlord has applied to terminate your tenancy in retaliation for you
having made an earlier application to ACAT or making a complaint to a
government organisation, or having otherwise sought to enforces your
rights, e.g. be seeking legal advice about their rights, then you may be
able to defend the eviction on that basis.
For details go to
“Tenancy Tips: Defending an Eviction”.
Do I need a lawyer?
Parties do not have to be
represented by a lawyer at the ACAT, although they can be. The Tribunal
will take into account whether parties are represented or not.
If a tenant is
unrepresented the Tribunal must actively assist them to understand the
hearing process and present their case (s81RTA). If unrepresented it is
advisable to at least seek advice before appearing at the Tribunal.
Advice can be obtained from the Tenants' Advice Service or the Welfare
Rights and Legal Centre.
It is very important that
a tenant, or their representative, attend the hearing. If there is any
problem with attendance, the Tribunal must be contacted immediately.
It is also useful to
observe a hearing at the Tribunal at an earlier date in order to become
aware of the environment.
Costs
Tenants can afford to
defend an eviction without fear of having to pay the landlord's legal
fees if unsuccessful. Section 48 of the ACAT Act 2008 expressly provides
that the parties to a Tribunal hearing will bear their own costs unless
the Tribunal orders otherwise. They can order that the unsuccessful
party pay the applicant’s filing fee.
The Tribunal can also
order a party to pay the others’ costs where that party caused
unreasonable delay or obstruction before or during the hearing (s
48(2)(b)).
Compensation
It must be noted however,
that RTA s56 does allow the landlord to make an application for
compensation where the tenant fails to vacate in accordance with a TPO.
The
landlord may claim:
· An
amount equal to the rent that would have been payable to the landlord
during the period the tenant was in possession of the premises after the
termination of the residential tenancy agreement;
· An
amount equal to the reasonable costs incurred by the landlord in
applying for a warrant and having the warrant executed.
The
tenant may claim:
For compensation where a
person (such as the landlord or their agent) enters premises for the
purpose of recovering possession,
without a warrant
from the Tribunal or order of the Supreme Court (s 37 RTA).
Public Housing
If you are in public
housing there is additional information you should know.
Go to the
Welfare
Rights and Legal Centre website (www.welfarerightsact.org)
for their Fact
Sheet on Eviction, or contact them directly on 6247 2177.
Back to top
This
is a summary of your rights and responsibilities.
If
you have a specific problem, you should seek more detailed advice.
The information provided is based on the current state of
tenancy law and details may change.
Tenancy
Tips © 2009 Tenants' Advice Service
The support of the ACT Government through the Dept. Justice
& Community Safety is gratefully acknowledged
|